Sustainability versus Development
E G Flynn
Global
Teacher, Autumn 2001
There
are finite resources on this planet. Only so much land,
only so much fuel. The only way you can make lots of money
out of these finite resources is to take an unfair share
of the resources. Which means that somewhere there'll be
someone else (or more likely millions of someone elses)
who have less than their fair share. You can't make a packet
out of producing trainers unless you pay the people who
make them very little, and get other people to buy lots
for lots of money.
The
economy of most of the world, and certainly the big corporations
of the G8 (France, Canada, Great Britain, Germany, Japan,
Italy, USA and Russia) is based on making profit. Capitalism
doesn't produce things we need. It produces things in order
to make a profit. So whether we need them or not, if companies
can sell them they'll keep making them. That is not sustainable
living. If we want to preserve some of this planet, if we
want to share what we've got more equally then some people
are going to have to downsize. And to be honest it's not
about me turning a few lights off. It's about the big, really
big, players saying "OK, well we've had a good innings,
and now it's time to let go of our mansions and our yachts
and our control over our governments. We will no longer
try to make as much money as possible by selling as much
oil as possible, so that there will be minimal carbon emissions.
What we'll do is we'll stop trying to get people to buy
new stuff all the time and we'll make do with less ourselves".
Likely story. But if we keep telling ourselves that it'll
all be alright if we turn off our lights then we are not
really changing anything. More than that, we are in danger
of creating an illusion that its possible to be sustainable
without challenging the very system that makes us unsustainable.
When
your main aim is profit, and then more profit, you need
raw materials, labour and consumers. If you want to keep
growing (the hallmark and raison d'etre of capitalism) you
have to keep seeking new sources of raw materials, low cost
labour and new markets. Sustainability doesn't come into
it. Sustainability is about producing what we need - producing
for now without jeopardizing the future. It is incompatible
with the capitalist motive of profit and growth.
There
are plenty of examples in the world of sustainable living.
Almost all of them come under threat from the dominant world
economic system because they do not conform with it: they
do not produce for and they do not buy from the dominant
world economic system.
Sustainability
and capitalism are irreconcilable. One sets out to use resources
wisely according to need, the other sets out to use as much
as possible to gain as much profit as possible. All talk
of recycling, reusing, renewable energy sources, less pollution
on a domestic level come to nothing when big business is
more concerned with protecting profit than protecting the
environment. President Bush's refusal to shift on the Kyoto
protocol on Climate Change was fuelled by the oil industry's
fears that cutting the use of oil and coal would affect
profits. Agreements on environmental issues are plagued
by refusal of many countries to be bound by rules. At best
there are guidelines. Countries don't even have to reduce
the amount of pollution they produce, they can simply buy
pollution credits from countries with less greenhouse gas
emissions. Yes we will have to stop shifting food that can
be grown locally half way across the world. Yes we will
have to cut fuel consumption, and use renewable energy.
But we will also have to put a stop to the system which
encourages production and consumption at levels way beyond
sustainability. And we will have to challenge the means
by which that system operates, and in doing so create a
world in which everyone has an opportunity to share in the
resources that we have. A world where people come before
profit. If as educators we do not address this wider picture,
if we stay in the safe haven of solar panels and compost,
then we are at best tinkering around at the edges, and at
worst supporting the very system that is destroying this
planet.
Back
to Discussion Articles Page
|